We have recently upgraded our TigerGraph version, and I have two instances of the same query over the same data having different results. One of the things I have diagnosed is an apparent change in the behavior of a MapAccum < STRING, INT > @@myMap or MapAccum <INT, INT> @@myMap
Previously, if I did this : ACCUM @@myMap += (value -> 1)
The integer would accumulate - but I have a query running right now where I always get a 1.
It would seem that the change is MapAccum < INT, SumAccum < INT >> @@myMap
But the question remains - did something change? is the nested SumAccum required?